The packaging landscape is undergoing its most dramatic transformation in decades. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) isn't just another regulatory trend, it's a fundamental reimagining of how we think about packaging throughout its entire lifecycle. For businesses across America, this shift represents both a challenge and an unprecedented opportunity to lead in sustainability while staying ahead of rapidly evolving compliance requirements.

‍

At its core, EPR flips the traditional model on its head. Instead of consumers and governments bearing the burden of packaging waste management, responsibility returns to where many argue it belongs: with the companies that create the packaging in the first place. This isn't just about paying fees, it's about incentivizing smarter design decisions that consider environmental impact from day one.

‍

EPR serves as a powerful catalyst for the circular economy, pushing companies beyond superficial "green" marketing toward meaningful changes in how they design, produce, and think about packaging. The results speak for themselves: reduced landfill waste, decreased resource extraction, and a surge in innovation around sustainable materials and design practices.

‍

As legislation continues its rapid expansion across the United States, staying informed isn't just advisable—it's essential for maintaining competitive advantage and ensuring long-term business viability. The companies that understand and adapt to this new reality early will find themselves leading their industries, while those that wait may face significant compliance challenges and competitive disadvantages.

‍

At Grounded, we're committed to ensuring our customers have access to the most current, actionable EPR intelligence as it relates to their packaging strategies. Our mission is straightforward: help you navigate regulatory changes confidently while developing sustainable, future-ready solutions that position your business for success.

‍

‍

The Current Landscape: States Leading the EPR Revolution

‍

California – SB 54: Setting the Global Standard

California's Plastic Pollution Producer Responsibility Act represents perhaps the most ambitious packaging legislation ever enacted in the United States. The state isn't just asking for incremental improvements—it's demanding a complete transformation of the single-use packaging ecosystem.‍

‍

What makes California's approach revolutionary: The legislation creates a dual mandate that's unprecedented in its scope. Companies must achieve a 25% reduction in single-use plastic packaging by 2032 while simultaneously ensuring 100% of their packaging meets recyclability, compostability, or reuse standards by the same deadline.

‍

This dual requirement creates fascinating strategic challenges. Companies can't simply switch to recyclable materials and consider the job done—they must also actively reduce their overall plastic footprint. The environmental impact-based fee structure adds another layer of complexity, essentially creating a market-based pricing system where sustainable choices become financially advantageous.‍

‍

Critical Timeline: Producer Responsibility Organisations must be established by 2025, with full program operation beginning in 2027. For many companies, this timeline represents one of the most significant packaging overhauls they'll ever undertake.

‍

Oregon – SB 582: The Transparency Trailblazer

Oregon's Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act distinguishes itself through its emphasis on creating genuine transparency in recycling outcomes. Beyond managing waste, Oregon is demanding unprecedented visibility into what actually happens to materials after they enter the recycling stream—addressing one of the industry's most persistent blind spots.

‍

The state's approach targets packaging, printing and writing paper, and food service ware, creating one of the most comprehensive EPR programs in the nation. With full program launch expected in 2025, Oregon is positioning itself as one of the first states to demonstrate how comprehensive EPR can work in practice.‍

‍

Why this matters: Oregon's transparency requirements could become the template for other states, potentially creating national standards for recycling accountability and performance measurement.

‍

Maine – LD 1541: The Municipal Liberation Strategy

Maine's approach directly tackles a problem felt in communities nationwide: the crushing financial burden of recycling programs on local governments. By shifting these costs from taxpayers to producers, Maine is pioneering a model that could save municipalities millions while creating powerful incentives for better packaging design.

‍

The legislation targets all consumer packaging and includes robust reporting requirements that will give stakeholders unprecedented insight into packaging flows and impacts. Fee collection begins in 2026, providing a strategic implementation timeline that balances urgency with practical preparation needs.

‍

Colorado – HB 22-1355: The Universal Access Vision

Colorado's ambitious goal of providing free recycling access to all residents represents a fundamental reimagining of waste management as a public service. The state's eco-modulation system creates direct financial connections between packaging design decisions and environmental outcomes, essentially turning sustainability into a competitive advantage.

‍

The involvement of a third-party nonprofit to manage the funding mechanism adds an interesting governance dimension that could influence how other states structure their programs. Full operation by 2026 makes Colorado a critical test case for comprehensive EPR implementation.

‍

Minnesota – The Newest Player

Minnesota's Packaging Waste and Cost Reduction Act, passed in May 2024, represents the latest addition to the EPR landscape. While program details are still being developed, the state's explicit focus on both waste reduction and cost reduction suggests a particularly business-friendly approach that could influence future legislation nationwide.

‍

Maryland – The Comprehensive Approach

Maryland's HB 284 extends EPR beyond traditional packaging to include beverage containers, potentially creating one of the most comprehensive producer responsibility programs in the nation. The state's ongoing program development process is being closely monitored by industry stakeholders as a potential model for future comprehensive EPR legislation.

‍

‍

States on the Horizon: The Next Wave of EPR Legislation

The momentum behind EPR is accelerating rapidly, with several states advancing legislation that could significantly expand the regulatory landscape:

‍

New York – The Game Changer

New York's Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act passed the Senate but stalled in the Assembly as of June 2024. However, given New York's economic significance, any EPR program in the state would have national implications. The proposed 30% reduction in single-use plastic packaging over 12 years, combined with improved recyclability requirements, would affect countless national brands and supply chains.

‍

Massachusetts – The Multi-Pronged Approach

Massachusetts has introduced multiple EPR bills (HB 4263, H833, and SB S570) currently awaiting committee review. These proposals target both packaging and paint, with ambitious goals for recycling rates and toxic substance reduction. Massachusetts' reputation as a regulatory innovator makes these bills worth watching closely.

‍

Rhode Island – The Integrated Strategy

Rhode Island's combined Deposit Return System (DRS) and EPR bill, introduced in April 2025, represents an innovative approach to packaging waste management. Following a comprehensive study on recycling practices, the state is considering integrated solutions that could provide a model for other smaller states.

‍

Illinois and Connecticut – The Rapid Adopters

Both Illinois (SB 1555) and Connecticut (HB 6664) passed EPR legislation in 2023, demonstrating the accelerating pace of adoption. These programs establish EPR requirements for all packaging types while including specific exclusions that could influence how other states craft their own legislation.

‍

‍

Strategic Implications for Business Success

The proliferation of state-level EPR legislation creates a complex but navigable landscape for forward-thinking businesses. While compliance complexity is real—managing different requirements, timelines, and fee structures across multiple states—this complexity also creates significant opportunities for companies that can get ahead of the curve.

‍

The Early Adopter Advantage

Companies investing in sustainable packaging design now will find themselves at a substantial competitive advantage as EPR programs roll out nationwide. Early adopters benefit from:

• Lower compliance costs across multiple states
• Enhanced brand reputation and consumer loyalty
• Improved operational efficiency through streamlined packaging systems
• Potential revenue opportunities through sustainable packaging innovation

‍

The Cost of Waiting

Companies that delay EPR preparation may face:

• Higher fees and penalties as programs become operational
• Rushed compliance efforts that compromise quality and cost-effectiveness
• Potential market access issues in EPR states
• Competitive disadvantages as consumers increasingly prefer sustainable options

‍

‍

Critical Success Factors for EPR Compliance

‍

1. Compliance is Inevitable

Even if your business doesn't currently sell directly into EPR states, similar legislation is under discussion in dozens of other states. The regulatory trend is clear, and future-proofing your packaging strategy isn't just smart, it's essential for long-term viability.

‍

2. Eco-Modulation Creates Competitive Advantage

Most EPR programs will charge producers significantly lower fees for sustainable packaging choices. This means material selection has evolved from an environmental consideration to a direct competitive factor affecting your bottom line.

‍

3. Data Management is Critical

Robust data management systems for tracking packaging materials, volumes, and supply chain flows will become essential for compliance and fee calculation. Companies that invest in these systems early will have smoother transitions and better cost control.

‍

4. Small Producer Protections Exist

Many programs include exemptions for companies below specific revenue thresholds. However, verifying your exemption status and understanding how growth might affect your compliance obligations is crucial for strategic planning.

‍

5. International Momentum is Accelerating

As more states evaluate EPR legislation and international markets implement similar requirements, adopting sustainable, circular-ready packaging positions your business as an industry leader ready for global expansion.

‍

‍

Your Path Forward with Grounded

At Grounded, we understand that navigating the EPR landscape can feel overwhelming. That's why we've made it our mission to make sustainable packaging accessible, straightforward, and genuinely future-ready. We continuously monitor legislative developments, collaborate with industry partners, and invest in innovative solutions to ensure your packaging not only meets current regulations but anticipates what's coming next.

‍

Our approach is built on three core principles:

• Proactive Intelligence: We track regulatory developments before they impact your business
• Practical Solutions: We provide actionable strategies that balance sustainability with business objectives
• Partnership Focus: We work alongside you to develop packaging solutions that enhance your brand while meeting compliance requirements

‍

‍

Stay Ahead with Grounded

The EPR revolution is here, and the companies that embrace it will define the future of packaging. Whether you need guidance on how EPR regulations impact your specific business model, help creating packaging that's compliant and sustainable, or strategic advice on future-proofing your packaging portfolio, we're here to support your success.

‍

Contact us today to discuss how we can support your sustainable packaging journey and position your business for long-term success in the new EPR economy.