Close Cookie Popup
Cookie Settings
By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to improve our services and your browsing experience.
The European Union is currently attempting the most ambitious packaging recyclability transition in the world through the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), requiring all packaging to be Designed for Recycling by 2030 and Recycled at Scale by 2035. But there currently stands a gap between regulatory ambition and infrastructure reality.
This is the state of soft plastic recycling across the EU, market by market, and where the system is heading.
According to Plastics Recyclers Europe, more than 300,000 tonnes per year of mechanical recycling capacity closed in 2024 alone, the largest contraction on record. Preliminary 2025 data showed a further 50% rise in facility closures, bringing total EU recycling capacity losses to close to one million tonnes over three years.
The cause is economic. A global oversupply of cheap petrochemicals pushed virgin plastic prices down sharply, making recycled plastic uncompetitive. High European energy costs compounded the problem. EPR fee revenues also fell in 2024, reducing cash flow to recyclers.
Total installed EU plastics recycling capacity was 13.5 million tonnes in 2024, well below the 6% annual growth rate required to meet PPWR targets. The PPWR's mandated recycled content requirements from 2030 are designed to create structural demand for recycled material that is insulated from commodity price swings. But that structural demand does not exist yet, and the near-term closures are real.
Installed capacity for recycling PE and PP flexible films in Europe stood at approximately 2.7 million tonnes in 2020. This represents about 28% of total plastics recycling infrastructure. Germany, France, and Italy have the most developed lightweight packaging collection systems that include flexible film. Belgium and Sweden have been significantly upgrading their collection and sorting infrastructure. Southern and Eastern European member states lag substantially in both areas.
Germany has the most mature packaging recycling system in the EU. The dual system (Duales System Deutschland) requires producers to fund yellow bin collection of lightweight packaging including flexible plastic. Flexible film is collected co-mingled with other lightweight packaging and sorted at specialist facilities.
Belgium consistently achieves the highest overall packaging recycling rate in the EU at 80%, already exceeding the EU's 2030 target of 70%, and does so without a deposit return scheme.
Ireland launched its deposit return scheme (DRS) for plastic bottles and cans in February 2024 and achieved a 72% collection rate within 18 months. On soft plastics, Ireland is working to expand kerbside acceptance through its Repak EPR system.
France operates one of the EU's largest packaging EPR programmes through Citeo. MRFs accept lightweight packaging including flexible film in co-mingled collection, though sorting efficiency varies by facility and the quality of recovered film bales is inconsistent.
The Netherlands achieves 76% overall packaging recycling despite significant economic pressure on its recycling sector.
Sweden opened Site Zero in November 2024, described as the world's largest plastics sorting plant. It can sort 12 plastic types at 95% efficiency using AI and near-infrared (NIR) sensor technology, with flexible film as one of those 12 streams.
Norway is not an EU member state but is directly relevant to EU market dynamics given its close integration with European packaging material flows. TOMRA opened its Oslofjord facility in November 2025, handling 90,000 tonnes of plastic packaging per year and representing a new national infrastructure benchmark.
Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, and other Central and Eastern European member states have substantially lower packaging recycling rates and significantly less developed infrastructure for soft plastic collection and sorting.
When flexible film is collected and mechanically recycled in Europe, it becomes recycled PE or PP pellets used primarily in non-packaging applications: agricultural film, construction sheeting, pipe, and outdoor furniture. Closed-loop recycling, where flexible film returns to food-grade flexible packaging, is technically possible but commercially rare.
Output quality is constrained by contamination from inks, adhesives, and mixed-material structures in the input stream. Clean mono-material PE film produces higher-grade pellets with broader end-market options. Mixed or contaminated input produces lower-grade material.
Chemical recycling is being positioned as the solution for complex laminates and contaminated film that mechanical recycling cannot handle. The current reality is more qualified.
Of 65 chemical recycling projects planned across Europe with a combined stated capacity of 2.8 million tonnes per year, only 18 plants were operational as of October 2025, producing approximately 290,000 tonnes per year. Economics, feedstock quality challenges, and regulatory uncertainty have all slowed scaling.
The longer-term trajectory is more positive:
The PPWR creates the most ambitious regulatory framework for flexible packaging recyclability in the world. Key milestones for flexible film brands are:
PPWR mandates that all 27 EU member states implement eco-modulated EPR fees based on packaging recyclability grades by approximately 2029. This eliminates the current patchwork of different national EPR approaches and creates a consistent financial incentive for recyclable packaging design across the entire EU market.
Site Zero and the AI-sorting wave
Sweden's Site Zero and TOMRA's Oslofjord facility represent what is technically achievable now. As the economics of advanced sorting improve and PPWR drives investment, similar facilities will be built across Europe, including in member states that currently have no film-specific sorting capability.
€7.6 to 9.1 billion PPWR investment requirements
CEFLEX has estimated that achieving EU flexible packaging recycling targets requires €7.6 to 9.1 billion in investment in collection, sorting, and processing infrastructure. PPWR's eco-modulated EPR mechanism from 2029 creates a dedicated, recurring funding stream for this investment that is not dependent on commodity market conditions.
Mono-material design as the structural shift
Industry initiatives to meet PPWR targets are accelerating development of mono-material flexible packaging across the EU. All-PE and all-PP flexible structures, designed to be sortable by NIR and recyclable through the mechanical recycling infrastructure being built, are the direction the EU packaging industry is moving.
Multi-layer laminates combining incompatible polymer families are likely to receive low recyclability grades under the 2028 Design for Recycling criteria, with sub-grade-C packaging banned from 2030.
Deposit return schemes in all 27 member states by 2029
Germany's DRS achieves 98% collection. As DRS rollout improves the quality and quantity of collected material across all member states, EPR systems for the remaining packaging categories, including flexible film, will have better-funded and better-structured infrastructure to build from.
The near-term EU recycling capacity crisis is real, but it is a cyclical economic problem. The PPWR's structural mechanisms, mandated recycled content, recyclability grades, and eco-modulated EPR fees, will resolve it over time by making recycling infrastructure commercially viable at the necessary scale.
Three actions are worth prioritising now.
Every packaging SKU placed on the EU market requires a Declaration of Conformity by 12 August 2026. For flexible packaging, this means gathering material composition data by layer, PFAS test results for food contact formats, and recyclability assessment evidence. The data gathering process takes time. Start now.
If your flexible packaging uses fluorinated grease-resistance or barrier coatings in food contact applications, the August 2026 PFAS limits are the most pressing compliance issue. Test for total fluorine now. Fluorine-free alternatives exist; the lead time is in testing, validating, and transitioning supply, not in finding a solution.
Multi-layer laminates that combine incompatible polymers are likely to receive sub-grade-C recyclability ratings under the 2028 criteria, with a ban from 2030. Mono-material PE flexible structures are the format best positioned for the post-2030 EU market. Brands selling meaningful volumes across the EU should treat the laminate-to-mono-material transition as a near-term project, not a 2028 problem.
No, it varies considerably. Germany, Belgium, Sweden, and the Netherlands have relatively mature systems for lightweight packaging collection including flexible film. France and Italy have large-scale EPR systems with variable MRF sorting quality. Southern and Eastern European member states generally have much less developed collection and sorting infrastructure for flexible film.
The Design for Recycling criteria and A to C recyclability grades will be published by 1 January 2028. Packaging below grade C will be banned from the EU market from 1 January 2030. Multi-layer laminates combining incompatible polymers, foil-based structures, and metallised films are likely to receive lower grades because they cannot be effectively sorted and processed by European recycling infrastructure. Mono-material PE flexible structures are better positioned for higher grades. The 2028 publication date gives brands two years to transition any sub-grade-C packaging before the ban takes effect.
The closures reflect near-term economics, not long-term trajectory. Global oversupply of cheap petrochemicals has pushed virgin plastic prices down sharply, making recycled plastic uncompetitive on price. High European energy costs raise recycling operating costs. EPR fee revenues fell significantly in 2024, reducing cash flow to recyclers. These are cyclical pressures. The PPWR's mandated recycled content targets from 2030 will create structural demand for recycled PE and PP that is not subject to the same commodity volatility. That structural demand is what the recycling industry needs to invest in capacity with confidence.